SC upholds HUDA's rejection of highest bid for Gurgaon tower

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 27 2017 | 8:13 PM IST
In a major verdict, the Supreme Court today upheld the decision of the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) to reject the highest bid of Rs 111.75 crore of a firm for a commercial tower on over nine acres of land in Gurgaon, saying the "huge property was saved from being plundered".
The apex court also imposed a fine of Rs 5 lakh on Orchid Infrastructure Developers P Ltd, the highest bidder, after taking note that it had not filed the court fees before the trial court and in the high court while filing suit and appeals.
"We are of the considered opinion that there was no right acquired and no vested right accrued in favour of the plaintiff merely because its bid amount was highest and had deposited 10 per cent of bid amount," a bench of justices Arun Mishra and Amitava Roy said while allowing the appeal of HUDA against the Punjab and Haryana High Court verdict.
"The Administrator (of HUDA) had the right to reject the bids and he had rejected it on sufficient ground, duly considering the materials on record... In the interest of the public, revenue of the state and in the interest of HUDA, the huge property was saved from being plundered," the verdict, written by Justice Mishra, said.
While imposing costs, it said, "...We impose costs of Rs 5 lakh on the plaintiff/respondent to be deposited as : Rs 2.5 lakhs in the Advocates' Welfare Fund and Rs 2.5 lakhs in the Supreme Court Employees' Welfare Fund within a period of two months from today."
Bhudeep Builders and Exporters Pvt Ltd, later renamed as Orchid Infrastructure Developers P. Ltd, had emerged winner by offering highest bid of Rs 111.75 crore for commercial tower situated in Sector 29, Urban Estate, Gurgaon, in area measuring 9.527 acres in the auction held on May 24, 2004.
However, the denial of formal letter of allotment to the firm led to initiation of the legal battle between the company and HUDA.
The civil court allowed the plea of the company which was later reversed by the District Judge, Gurgaon, the first appellate court on November 29, 2010.
The company then approached the High Court which allowed its appeal, leading HUDA to move the apex court.
Upholding HUDA's decision, the apex court said, "We are satisfied that the rejection of the bid by the Administrator was absolutely proper and justified and was beyond the pale of judicial scrutiny.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 27 2017 | 8:13 PM IST

Next Story