Congress hails Sabarimala verdict as progressive step to gender equality

The Supreme court made it clear that there could be no discrimination in matters of faith on the basis of gender or otherwise, said Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala

Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala
Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala says BJP politicising surgical strikes. Photo: @ANI
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 17 2018 | 10:07 AM IST

The Congress on Friday welcomed the Supreme Court verdict lifting a ban on the entry of women in Kerala's Sabarimala temple, calling it a progressive and far-reaching decision towards gender equality that gave a fresh expression to women's rights.

Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala said the court had made it clear that there could be no discrimination in matters of faith on the basis of gender or otherwise.
 

ALSO READ: Sabarimala updates: Temple gates open at 5pm; security beefed up in Kerala

"We wholeheartedly welcome this progressive and far-reaching decision in case of entry into Sabarimala temple. Supreme Court decision has given a fresh expression to the rights of women and how they cannot be subjugated to any religious practice, no matter how sacred," he said on Twitter.

The Congress leader also said, "There can be no discrimination to worship on the basis of gender or otherwise. A welcome and progressive move towards gender equality by Supreme Court in Sabarimala."

"As society evolves, so should our religious beliefs and laws," he tweeted.

In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court Friday lifted the ban that prevented women and girls between the age of 10 and 50 from entering the famous Sabarimala temple in Kerala, holding this centuries-old Hindu religious practice is illegal and unconstitutional.

Women activists hailed the judgement that paved the way for entry of female devotees of all ages as a victory for gender equality while Union Women and Child Development Minister Maneka Gandhi said it would make Hinduism even more inclusive. The temple barred women of a "menstruating age"-- defined as between the ages of 10 and 50 -- from entering.

The Chief Justice Dipak Misra-headed Constitution bench in a 4-1 verdict held that the existing ban is "gender discrimination" and the practice violates the rights of Hindu women.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 28 2018 | 6:00 PM IST

Next Story