The state cabinet, which met here today, gave its nod to the bill, sources said. However, there was no official briefing on the cabinet meeting in view of the session tomorrow.
The bill would be introduced in the assembly as per the TRS' election promise to make efforts to provide 12 per cent quota each for backward sections among Muslims and STs.
The state government would make efforts to realise the promise, though it required Centre's nod, as it was part of TRS' election manifesto, Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao had said earlier this week.
The Centre would have to give its assent as 69 per cent quota is already under implementation in Tamil Nadu, he had said.
As the TRS government is exactly following the Tamil Nadu model, the increased reservations should be incorporated in the 9th Schedule of Constitution so that it cannot be questioned in court, he had said.
The opposition BJP has been strident in its opposition to the proposal, alleging that it is against the spirit of Constitution as it is "communal".
Union Minister M Venkaiah Naidu had yesterday said the implementation of reservations on the basis of religion may result in social unrest in the country and "lead to creation of another Pakistan".
Speaking at a BJP meeting organised on the occasion of the Ambedkar Jayanti yesterday, Naidu had also hinted that Telangana's proposal to hike reservations for certain sections may not be constitutionally valid.
"We are not opposing (reservation on religion basis) because KCR (Telangana CM K Chandrashekhar Rao) wants to implement it," he said, adding, "The BJP opposed such a move even when Rajasekhara Reddy (late CM of united Andhra Pradesh) and Chandrababu Naidu (present CM) also tried to do that."
Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in Telangana Legislative Council Mohd Ali Shabbir today slammed the BJP for categorising the minorities quota as a "religious reservation".
"The BJP has given ten per cent quota to Patels in Gujarat. Is it not a religious reservation ?" he asked.
BJP floor leader in assembly, G Kishan Reddy, alleged that the TRS government is acting "unilaterally" as it gave no information about the issue to opposition.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
