Raising the issue soon after the House assembled for the day, Leader of Opposition Ghulam Nabi Azad suggested that the Governor was "interfering" with the activities of the state government and the Legislature over summoning of Winter Session of the assembly and "deciding" its agenda "without the state government requesting for it".
Azad made a strong attack on the style of functioning of Rajkhowa. However, a number of his remarks were expunged later.
"Our party will not allow it to happen. The Opposition will not allow it," he said alleging that the Constitution is being violated.
As soon as Azad raised the issue, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley disapproved of Parliament discussing a matter concerning a state assembly.
Raising a point of order, Union minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said the House cannot sit over making judgements on the proceedings of an Assembly and neither can the role of a governor be discussed here.
Rajkhowa has summoned the Winter Session of the 6th
Legislative Assembly from tomorrow till December 18, modifying the November 3 order summoning the assembly from January 14 to 18 next year.
Azad also claimed that Rajkhowa has decided that the Speaker would not preside over the session.
The order to advance the assembly session stipulates that the resolution seeking the Speaker's removal would be the first item of business in the session.
The Leader of Opposition also accused the Governor of "evil interference" in the state government's functioning.
In the 60-member state Assembly, Congress has 47 MLAs and BJP 11.
The last session of the Assembly had come to an end on October 31, which was prorogued on November 3.
Citing rules, Deputy Chairman P J Kurien said that since the notice given by Azad to take up the matter was "not a substantive motion" required to discuss the functioning of people holding posts like that of Governor, a discussion on the matter cannot be allowed.
"Rule 38 is very clear that the conduct of a Governor can be discussed only through a substantive motion. I have seen the notice given by the LOP. This motion is under Rule 267. It is not a substantive motion. It is a motion only for suspension of business. What can I do? You should have given a substantive motion," Kurien said.
Naresh Gujral (SAD) said that Congress members do not want the House to function. Mayawati (BSP) said also wanted to speak on the matter as she briefly touched on the role of Governors in Uttar Pradesh as well.
As the Congress members refused to vacate the Well and kept shouting slogans, the Deputy Chairman adjourned the House for 30 minutes.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
