West Australia scraps shark cull policy

Image
AFP Sydney
Last Updated : Sep 12 2014 | 10:54 AM IST
The Western Australia government today said it would abandon its controversial catch-and-kill shark policy after objections from the state's environmental agency, in a move welcomed by conservationists.
Premier Colin Barnett ruled out further use of drum lines to hook sharks off the state's busiest beaches during the southern summer.
He said his government would now focus on possibly removing "rogue" sharks that "stay in one area for repeated periods".
"While the state government could challenge the (Environmental Protection Authority) decision, all we would find is endless court battles and injunctions," Barnett told ABC radio.
Under the policy, 72 baited hooks attached to floating drums were to be put in place between November and April each year until 2017.
Along with other measures, the aim was to protect swimmers, with captured sharks killed if considered a threatening size.
But the Environmental Protection Authority said yesterday that "there remains a high degree of scientific uncertainty about impacts on the viability of the south-western white shark population".
"At this stage, the available information and evidence does not provide the EPA with a high level of confidence," the agency's chairman Paul Vogel added in a statement.
"In view of these uncertainties, the EPA has adopted a cautious approach by recommending against the proposal."
The Australian Marine Conservation Society said the cull policy "was flawed from the get go, with no clear public safety outcomes but with a heavy environmental cost".
"The WA government needs to continue to invest in alternatives including early detection systems, enhanced surveillance, non-lethal barrier options and public education."
The catch-and-kill policy was introduced as a trial last summer around popular west coast beaches following a spate of fatal attacks.
More than 170 sharks, mostly tiger sharks, were caught during the 13-week season, with 50 of the biggest ones destroyed.
Barnett said sharks that lingered too long in one area needed to be caught and removed, pointing to the killing of a swimmer off a popular beach in the eastern state of New South Wales on Tuesday.
"What do we do when we see evidence of a large shark close into swimming areas, most likely in the south-west areas (of the state), do we just sit back and watch?
"I'd use the term maybe a rogue shark, a shark that stays in one area for repeated periods, I think we need to catch that shark and remove it.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 12 2014 | 10:54 AM IST

Next Story