Recently, Sanjay Leela Bhansali's "Padmavati" faced the ire of certain groups who attacked the filmmaker and also damaged the film's set in two separate incidents for allegedly deviating from history over the depiction of queen Padmavati.
Anjum was speaking at the 18th edition of FICCI Frames 2017 on topic 'Brave voices: Screenwriters who are changing the game'. When asked if it is okay for writers to take creative liberties while depicting historical characters, Anjum says, "Do I believe history should be distorted? No.
Anjum, who has written films like "Ghulam", "Apaharan" and "Raajneeti", says there is much debate among historians over the existence of Padmavati and one should be cautious of "prejudging" the movie Bhansali is making.
"In this particular case, I would say we should be cautious of prejudging it. There is genuinely a debate among historians about the character Padmavati. There are palaces in the names of several mythical characters, but there is still a continuing debate if they were there or not."
"If you're doing something on anybody's history, one has to take pains to ensure there is an authenticity and yet as a storyteller you are allowed to reimagine that without distorting it.
"When we were doing something on Bhagat Singh we were accountable to that. But at the same time if there are certain dilemmas, doubts, contrary feelings that we may have had, you can imagine that within the framework of what he (Singh) was as a historical figure," he says.
"If I start something new, I will definitely think about the political scenario and which state in the country I am setting the film. Because I want to tell my story, I will have to protect myself by placing it smarty. I have to do that otherwise nobody is going to let me make my film.
"If the studio backs me, the government will stall me. Karan Johar has to go and apologise, he is a big producer. The smaller producers are struggling with the same thing. I am wary of the political scenario we are writing in," she adds.
"Everybody will speak but I don't think anybody is listening. I think people feel it is entertainment, and therefore, it can be a casualty amongst everything that's going on. Sadly, people don't take the film industry seriously," laments Pathak.
"The film industry is a fairly easy target now. Yet, it is so ironical that we are not taken seriously. We have people who are vocal about important issues affecting the industry but there is no forum for figuring out how to solve the problems.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
