By Sumeet Chatterjee and Himank Sharma
MUMBAI (Reuters) - India's market watchdog has started a probe into auto parts maker Castex Technologies , after investors alleged it manipulated its stock to trigger the conversion of bonds into equity, a source with direct knowledge of the matter said.
Castex's stock price more than quadrupled in the three months to end-June, triggering the mandatory conversion of $130 million of bonds into company equity. The shares subsequently fell sharply.
The company was not immediately available for comment on Friday. Last week it denied in a stock exchange filing that it had engaged in "unfair practices", submitted after local media reports of bondholder claims about share price moves.
The allegations against Castex throw a spotlight on the quality of corporate oversight at a time when India is campaigning to attract billions in foreign cash to fuel its economic recovery.
"We have received complaints and are looking into whether there is evidence of any wrongdoing," said the source, who declined to be named as the case is not public.
He said the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) had asked for detailed trading data of the company's shares from the stock exchanges and will now analyse the data.
A representative for the regulator was not immediately available for comment.
According to a 2012 covenant, conversion of the Castex bonds, originally due in 2017, would be triggered if the company's shares traded above a certain threshold for a month.
The stock soared from April to June but lost 90 percent of their value from a peak of 363.1 rupees on July 13. Bondholders complained to regulators, alleging that the company had artificially boosted the price to trigger a mandatory bond conversion and reduce its debt burden.
London-based law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, which represents the Castex bondholders, accused the company of manipulating its stock in a letter sent to SEBI and reviewed by Reuters.
SEBI has stepped up its fight against market manipulation but Castex bondholders criticised its lack of response to the sharp rise in the company's shares.
"What the regulator should have done very early on is suspend the trading of the stock," East said.
(Additional reporting by Devidutta Tripathy; Editing by Lisa Jucca and Edmund Klamann)
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
