After the Sandoz Minority Shareholders Association scored a victory by getting a valuer appointed in the case of the Hindustan Ciba-Geigy and Sandoz merger, a minority shareholder of Hindustan Ciba-Geigy has approached the Mumbai high court seeking a stay on the de-merger of Hindustan Ciba-Geigys speciality chemicals business.
The minority shareholder of Hindustan Ciba- Geigy, Dinesh V Lakhani, has moved the Mumbai high court for a stay on its earlier order approving the de-merger of Hindustan Ciba-Geigys speciality chemicals business.
Lakhani, has served notices on both Hindustan Ciba-Geigy and the advocate Crawford Bayley & Co. The petition, requesting the court to grant a stay, is coming up for hearing today.
Hind Cibas speciality chemicals business is being spun off into a separate company, to be called Ciba Speciality Chemicals (India) Ltd.
According to the scheme of arrangement, each Hindustan Ciba-Geigy shareholder will get one share in Ciba Speciality for every two shares held by them in the former.
Lakhani had objected to the scheme, saying that Hindustan Ciba-Geigy shareholders should get shares in the new company in the proportion of 1:1.
The Bombay High Court had, in its order passed on July 25, rejected Lakhanis objections and approved the scheme of the de-merger.
Lakhani says he is waiting for a copy of the order as he was not informed of the grounds on which his petition was dismissed and that he is seeking a stay till the time he files an appeal to a division bench.
At the extra-ordinary general meeting of the company held on December 10, Lakhani had moved an amendment for modifying the proportion of shares offered to the Hindustan
Ciba-Geigy shareholders to a 1:1 ratio.
However, the amendment had been ruled out of order by the chairman and the de-merger resolution was passed without any modification.
Giving reasons for his objection to the ratio for the de-merger, he cited the case of Sandoz which, while hiving off its speciality chemicals business, has given its shareholders shares in the proportion of 1:1 in the new company, Clariant (India) Ltd.
Hindustan Ciba-Geigy sources said that the amendment was not taken up as almost all shareholders were in favour of the scheme of the de-merger.
In his submission to the court, Lakhani said if an amendment is refused, all subsequent proceedings as regards to that particular question are invalidated.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
