Budget 2020: Time for govt to reintroduce wealth tax, says Abhijit Banerjee

India had passed the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 which was levied on an individual, a Hindu Undivided Family and a Corporate entity on its valuation, which was repealed in April 2016

Abhijit Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee. Photo- Sanjay K Sharma
Avishek Rakshit Kolkata
2 min read Last Updated : Jan 28 2020 | 12:22 AM IST
Considering the current stage of inequality in the country, it is time for India to reintroduce wealth tax in the Union Budget 2020 and also focus on redistribution of wealth, Nobel laureate Abhijit V Banerjee said on Monday.

“Given the amount of inequality now, wealth tax is completely sensible and more redistribution is required,” he said at the Tata Steel Kolkata Literary Meet. 

India had passed the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 which was levied on an individual, a Hindu Undivided Family and a Corporate entity on its valuation, which was repealed in April 2016.  

However, Banerjee remained skeptical about the current government's enthusiasm to introduce it. 

Responding to a question about his views on the Centre's disinvestment drive, Banerjee said, “I would love to sell out the prestigious PSUs.”

The 58-year old economist said that corporate tax cut hasn’t yielded the desired results and corporate India is sitting on a pile of cash. Instead, he stressed the need to refinance the banking sector and give a boost to the infrastructure segment. 

Banerjee, however, said that refinancing the banking sector will not yield results in the near future, rather will take time. 

Speaking on government programmes, he said that the Centre has undertaken “very expensive new schemes” like Ayushmann Bharat which once “properly implemented” will address some key welfare issues. Other schemes like Ujjwala and Swachh Bharat are also “costly” according to him. 

Asked about his viewpoint on migration in light of the ongoing protests around CAA and NRC, he said that migration is better for the economy as migrants put in their best to compete with the local population. 

He reasoned that migration is the result of either civil wars as in the case of West Asia or an economic catastrophe seen in the case of Greece from where around 50,000-60,000 people migrated elsewhere. 

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Abhijit BanerjeeIncome taxBudget estimatesBudget 2020Narendra Modi governmentIndividual wealthWealthy indiansPSU DisinvestmentCitizenship ActNational Register of Citizens

Next Story