No urgency to put retaliatory tariffs on US, says Indian official

India on Tuesday informed the WTO that the safeguard measures by the US would affect $7.6 billion exports by India into the United States

World Trade Organisation, WTO
India on Monday informed the WTO that the safeguard measures by the US would affect $7.6 bn exports by India into America, on which the duty collection by US would be $1.91 bn
Asit Ranjan Mishra Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : May 13 2025 | 11:45 PM IST
India notifying the World Trade Organization (WTO) on its intention to retaliate against the steel and aluminium safeguard duties by the US is procedural, and is only meant to reserve the right to take counter-measures, a commerce ministry official said on Tuesday.
 
“We had to file the notification by May 12 as the 30-day deadline was ending on that day. India had requested consultation with the US at WTO on the matter on April 11. Other countries like the UK (May 9) and Japan (May 12) also have filed their notifications to the WTO on the matter. Since we are engaged with the US for a bilateral trade agreement (BTA), there is no urgency to retaliate,” the official said, requesting anonymity. 
India on Monday informed the WTO that the safeguard measures by the US would affect $7.6 billion exports by India into America, on which the duty collection by Washington would be $1.91 billion. “Accordingly, India's proposed suspension of concessions would result in an equivalent amount of duty collected from products originating in the US,” the notification added. 
India had imposed retaliatory tariffs on 28 US products — ranging from almonds and apples to chemicals — in June 2019 after Washington removed India from its Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) and continued its steel and aluminium tariffs. That action, which covered about $240 million in trade value, marked India’s first use of WTO-sanctioned retaliation. The duties were withdrawn in September 2023 after both countries agreed to resolve six ongoing WTO disputes, including this one. 
Ajay Srivastava, founder of Delhi-based think tank Global Trade Research Initiative, said much now depends on Washington’s response. “India’s move reflects a broader shift: a willingness to assert itself within global trade rules to protect its economic interests,” he added.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :US India relations Trade tariffsIndia trade policyWTO India

Next Story