'Explain why aren't you liable': HC summons DM, SP in Hathras stampede case

Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav on January 6 said such incidents were the result of poor arrangements made by the organisers

Hathras stampede, Hathras Incident
Etah: Police personnel outside a hospital where victims of the Hathras' stampede are admitted, in Etah. (Photo: PTI)
Press Trust of India Prayagraj (UP)
2 min read Last Updated : Jan 08 2025 | 2:47 PM IST

The Allahabad High Court has directed the then district magistrate and senior superintendent of police of Hathras to personally appear on January 15 and explain why they should not be held liable for the stampede in 2024 that claimed 121 lives.

Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav on January 6 said such incidents were the result of poor arrangements made by the organisers.

"The organisers call innocent people for their benefit and due to lack of proper arrangements, such incidents happen. It is the responsibility of the administration to see whether there is proper arrangement of police force, medical, etc., or not," the judge said while hearing the bail plea of one Manju Devi.

The court further said, "In the past, many such incidents have been seen where lakhs of people gather in such events, poor and illiterate people gather due to faith and belief, and due to losing their temper, people die untimely in the stampede.

Government counsel Rupak Chaubey said the organisers sought permission estimating a crowd of 80,000 people, but a crowd of 2.5 lakh turned up at the venue.

On July 2, 2024, a stampede occurred during the "satsang" organised by the followers of Surajpal alias Bhole Baba in Fulrai Mughalgarhi Village of Hathras district leaving 121 dead and several injured.

While FIR was registered on the complaint of sub-inspector Brijesh Pandey, the petitioner's name cropped up during the investigation.

The court expressed the need for the district and police administration to take lessons from the Hathras incident and make proper arrangements for the upcoming Maha Kumbh in Prayagraj to avoid such mishaps.

The court posted the hearing on January 15.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Hathras caseUttar PradeshStampedeAllahabad High Court

First Published: Jan 08 2025 | 2:47 PM IST

Next Story