'INDIA' alliance MPs walk out of RS during Question Hour over Manipur issue

The Rajya Sabha members were on their feet from the beginning of the Question Hour, shouting "Manipur, Manipur"

Parliament
Photo: ANI | Twitter
Press Trust of India New Delhi
4 min read Last Updated : Aug 01 2023 | 2:54 PM IST

Members of the INDIA bloc parties on Tuesday walked out of the Rajya Sabha during the Question Hour over their demand for a discussion on the Manipur issue and a statement from Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the House.

When the House reconvened at noon after a brief adjournment for about 35 minutes, opposition parties continued with the sloganeering but Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar continued with the Question Hour despite the din.

The INDIA bloc parties staged a walkout at 12.30 pm.

The Rajya Sabha members were on their feet from the beginning of the Question Hour, shouting "Manipur, Manipur".

The Congress' chief whip Jairam Ramesh, said, "Today, too, the INDIA parties demanded the prime minister's presence in the Rajya Sabha to make a statement on Manipur, to be followed by a discussion."

He also alleged Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge was not allowed to speak. "All INDIA (alliance) parties walked out around 12:30 pm," Ramesh said in a tweet later.

The Rajya Sabha was earlier adjourned till noon amid protest by the opposition members demanding a discussion on the Manipur issue in the House. Before the adjourning House proceedings around 11.25 am, Dhankhar expressed concern over repeated disruptions over demand for a discussion on the Manipur issue under Rule 267 of the Rajya Sabha.

"We are becoming a subject of ridicule by the public at large," Dhankhar observed as opposition members, on their heels, kept raising slogans demanding a statement from the prime minister on the issue.

Rule 267 of the Rajya Sabha rulebook allows for the suspension of the day's business to debate on any issue suggested by a member.

The chairman had also "declined" 60 notices under Rule 267 stating they did not conform to the norms.

About the demand for the prime minister's statement in the House, he recalled that in 2014 too a similar demand was made, but the chair then had observed that such a demand was constitutionally "illpremised".

"I urge members to seriously introspect and not surrender the space of dialogue, discussion and deliberation, as the same will not serve the essence of the oath the members of this august have taken," Dhankhar said.

He said, "By our actions, we have plunged this institution... into virtual irrelevance. It does not gel with logic and rationale approach that for over last eight days the House is being disrupted over the same issue". Dhankhar told the Rajya Sabha members that the proceedings were being disrupted despite his ruling on July 20 for a short-duration discussion on Manipur under Rule 176.

He said a discussion was initiated the previous day but it remained "inconclusive" due to continued disruption in the House.

The chairman also said he had discussions with the floor leaders of various parties on Monday and suggested that more time could be allocated for the discussion so that everyone gets a chance to express their views.

"In spite of that, discussion could not take place. We have created a situation whereby we are throwing out the baby with the bath water," Dhankhar said.

Earlier in the day, CPI(M) MP John Brittas raised a point of order when a standing committee report on 'Citizens' Data Security and Privacy' of the Ministry of Electronics and IT was tabled in the House.

He pointed out that the report pertains to the digital data protection bill, which has been approved by the Cabinet but has not been introduced in the House nor referred to the standing committee.

"The standing committee has overstepped and it is beyond their jurisdiction and it is breaching your (Chair) authority and the authority of this House," he said.

The chairman, however, overruled the point of order and said it was right to place the report of a committee in the House and the "rest will follow in accordance with the rules".

"But to take a stand that this august House must not have such kind of input, your point of order is devoid of any merit," Dhankhar said.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :OppositionRajya SabhaParliament

First Published: Aug 01 2023 | 2:54 PM IST

Next Story