'Shocks our conscience': SC rebukes UP govt for Prayagraj demolitions

The Supreme Court slammed the Uttar Pradesh government for the 'inhuman and illegal' demolition of houses in Prayagraj, ordering ₹10 lakh compensation to each affected owner

SC, Supreme Court
The Supreme Court described the demolition in Prayagraj as a move that ‘shocked’ its conscience (Photo: PTI)
Nandini Singh New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Apr 01 2025 | 3:27 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

The Supreme Court on Tuesday slammed the Uttar Pradesh government and the Prayagraj Development Authority, accusing them of carrying out an ‘inhuman and illegal’ demolition of houses. The court reminded the authorities that the country operates under the rule of law and such actions cannot be allowed.
 
The Supreme Court said residential structures should not be demolished in such a manner, highlighting that the right to shelter and due process of law must be upheld.
 
The court described the demolition in Prayagraj as a move that ‘shocked’ its conscience, stressing the importance of proper legal procedures in such matters. It directed the Prayagraj Development Authority to pay ₹10 lakh compensation to each of the affected homeowners within a six weeks period.
 

‘High-handed’ demolition sparks outrage 

This decision comes after the court had, on March 24, made similar remarks, calling the demolition ‘high-handed’ and stating that it was a violation of basic legal principles. Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan are currently hearing the petition filed by Zulfiqar Haider, Ali Ahmed, and other affected individuals whose homes were demolished.
 
The petitioners had earlier approached the Allahabad High Court, which rejected their plea challenging the demolition. The petitioners claimed that they were served a notice on March 6, 2021, regarding alleged illegal constructions on a plot identified as Nazul Plot No. 19, located in Lukerganj, Prayagraj.
 

Incorrect assumption behind demolition 

The counsel for the petitioners argued that the demolition was carried out based on a misunderstanding. They claimed that the government wrongly assumed that the land in question belonged to Atiq Ahmed, a gangster-politician who was killed in a police encounter in 2023.
 
The petitioners also alleged that the UP government acted on this incorrect assumption, leading to the demolition of their homes.
 

UP govt defends demolition 

In the previous hearing on March 24, Attorney General R Venkataramani defended the state’s actions, stating that the government had followed the due process of law in serving notices to the homeowners.
 
He argued that the state was dealing with widespread illegal occupations in the region, which made it difficult to control unauthorised possession of land.
 
[With PTI inputs]
 
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Supreme CourtUttar Pradesh governmentPrayagrajBS Web Reports

First Published: Apr 01 2025 | 3:20 PM IST

Next Story