Sebi penalises individual for not complying with summons in HAL case

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had initiated adjudication proceedings against Mishra for the alleged violation of the regulatory norms

sebi
In a separate order, the markets watchdog imposed a penalty of Rs 7 lakh on Majestic Auto Ltd for flouting the disclosure rules.
Press Trust of India New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Jun 07 2024 | 8:04 PM IST

Sebi on Friday imposed a fine of Rs 20 lakh on Rajat Mishra for failing to comply with the summons issued by the authority in a matter pertaining to violation of market norms while dealing in Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd's (HAL) shares.

The regulator has directed the individual (Rajat Mishra) to pay the amount of penalty within 45 days.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had initiated adjudication proceedings against Mishra for the alleged violation of the regulatory norms.

Thereafter, a show cause notice was issued by Sebi to Mishra on May 8, 2024.

"I note ...that the investigation report in the matter records that failure to furnish information and failure to appear in person before the Investigating Authority (IA) by the entity (Mishra) has hampered the investigation process and shows his callous attitude and complete disregard to the regulator," Sebi's Adjudicating Officer Amar Navlani said in an order.

Accordingly, the regulator penalised Mishra for flouting the Sebi norms.

In a separate order, the markets watchdog imposed a penalty of Rs 7 lakh on Majestic Auto Ltd for flouting the disclosure rules.

Sebi had conducted an examination in respect of Majestic Auto Ltd (MAL). After the examination, the regulator observed that Majestic Auto had allegedly violated provisions of Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) rules.

"I note that the noticee (Majestic Auto) had neither denied nor disputed that Emirates Technologies Pvt Ltd (ETPL) was a related party to the noticee and that the transactions with ETPL during FY 2018-2019; 2019-2020 and April-May 2020 were related party transactions," Navlani said in the order.

Further, Sebi noted that MAL had failed to demonstrate that prior approval of audit committee was obtained and that shareholders' approval was obtained for material related party transaction during FY 2018-19.

Therefore, Majestic Auto had violated LODR regulations.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :SEBIHindustan Aeronautics

First Published: Jun 07 2024 | 8:03 PM IST

Next Story