In 2015, better targeted schemes such as the Focus Product Scheme and Focus Market Scheme were replaced with the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS).
A WTO panel ruled that MEIS was inconsistent with WTO disciplines. Although the government appealed to the dysfunctional WTO Appellate Body, it eventually withdrew MEIS and introduced the Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products scheme. Similarly, the Served from India Scheme gave way to the Services Exports from India Scheme, which was discontinued after 2019.
The numbers tell a sobering story. From 2013-14 to 2025-26, merchandise exports rose from about $313 billion to $442 billion. Merchandise imports rose faster, from about $451 billion to $775 billion. More importantly, India’s share in global merchandise exports remained stuck around 1.8 per cent.
Services did much better. Services exports rose from about $152 billion to $418 billion, while services imports increased from about $79 billion to $204 billion. India’s share in global services exports is now about 4.3 percent. In short, goods exports underperformed, while services exports gained strength. Meanwhile, the rupee weakened from ₹58.6 to ₹95.4 per dollar, making the dollar about 63 per cent costlier in rupee terms.
On imports, the government raised tariff and non-tariff barriers to protect domestic capacity and reduce import dependence. The simple average applied tariff is now around 15.8 per cent. Anti-dumping, safeguard and countervailing duties were imposed on hundreds of items. Quality control orders, minimum import prices, import licensing and registration requirements were used more frequently. Such measures helped some large domestic producers but hurt downstream user industries, especially MSMEs, by raising input costs for them — a poor policy choice.GST was a major structural reform that simplified refund procedures for exporters. Refund of IGST paid on export goods and services, and refund of unutilised input tax credit on exports under LUT/bond, became more system driven.
Yet exporters also faced avoidable costs because of the pre-import condition in advance authorisations and restrictive conditions for rebate of GST paid on export goods. The reform helped, but implementation was not always trade friendly. The PLI scheme in 14 sectors was another important intervention. It has worked in electronics, particularly mobile phones. However, results in several other sectors are modest. Even in electronics, domestic value addition remains around 18 to 20 percent. Apparently, assembly has grown faster than deeper manufacturing.
The government invested heavily in roads, railways, dedicated freight corridors, ports and airports. Official estimates now place logistics costs at about 8 percent of GDP, below the commonly cited earlier figures of 13-14 percent. After walking out of RCEP, the mega trade deal in East Asia, the government pursued FTAs with richer countries aggressively. However, their outcomes remain uneven; utilisation by exporters is limited, while imports under preferential routes have grown faster in several agreements. The next phase must move from protection to competitiveness: lower input costs, simpler procedures, credible FTA monitoring, faster refunds, and predictable regulation. India cannot build export strength by making imports costly; it must make domestic production competitive.
 "Container port")