NCLAT can't force us to change approved resolution plan: Essar Steel CoC

The lenders to debt-ridden Essar Steel had approached the apex court on Monday challenging the NCLAT's March 18 and March 20 orders

Essar Steel
Aashish Aryan New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Apr 04 2019 | 9:58 PM IST
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) or the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) cannot force the Committee of Creditors (CoC) of Essar Steel India Limited to change the terms of the resolution plan after it has been approved under Section 3 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), lenders said in their plea before the Supreme Court.

The lenders to debt-ridden Essar Steel had approached the apex court on Monday challenging the NCLAT’s March 18 and March 20 orders in which it had asked the Resolution Professional (RP) of the company to call a fresh meeting of the CoC to consider redistribution of funds among the financial and operational creditors. The matter will be heard on April 8.

Essar Steel lenders have also challenged the NCLT Ahmedabad’s March 8 judgement in which it had, while approving the resolution plan of ArcelorMittal, suggested that the CoC of the debt-ridden Essar Steel reconsider the distribution of funds among the operational and financial creditors.  

In their plea before the apex court, the CoC of Essar Steel said that once the plan was approved by the NCLT and the NCLAT, any variation in payments to the financial and operational creditors of the company would amount to variation in the consent given by the members of the lenders’ committee.

“In the aforesaid circumstances, the directions to reconsider manner of distribution of proceeds under a resolution plan in light of the adjudicating authority’s (NCLT’s) suggestions and recommendations is completely unwarranted, unjustifiable, and equally without jurisdiction,” the CoC said in its plea.

Such directions by NCLT and NCLAT asking the lenders to reconsider the distribution of funds among the various creditors take away the rights of the CoC to make commercial decisions. The orders, the CoC said, proceed on an assumption that the distribution of proceeds under ArcelorMittal’s plan is “discriminatory and fails to balance the interest of all stakeholders including the operational creditors".

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story