SEBI Vs Sahara - 5 things you need to know

A quick snapshot of the SEBI vs Sahara battle so far

BS Web team Mumbai
Last Updated : Nov 22 2013 | 4:29 PM IST
1) What is the case all about? 
 
Between 2008 and 2011, two unlisted Sahara group companies (SCSCL and SHICL) raised around Rs 18,000 Cr issuing OFCDs (Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures) to roughly 30 million shareholders. In 2011, SEBI ordered the group to refund this money to investors with 15% annual interest. This order was upheld by the Supreme Court. 

2) Why did SEBI ask Sahara to refund the money? 
 
SEBI asked Sahara to refund investors because it felt Sahara was raising money in violation of capital raising norms and certain sections of the Companies Act. SEBI found that under the garb of an OFCD the company was running an extensive parabanking activity without conforming to regulatory disclosures and investor protection norms pertaining to public issues. 
 
3) What did Sahara do? 
 
Sahara challenged SEBI’s order saying the capital markets regulator did not have any jurisdiction over the group companies since they were not listed. The court dismissed Sahara’s petition, also hauling it up for not complying with its orders. 
 
4) What orders did Sahara not comply with? 
 
The court directed Sahara to furnish details of the OFCDs it had issued including subscriptions and refunds within 10 days and submit these to SEBI. It also gave Sahara 90 days to deposit roughly Rs 24,000 Cr. SEBI which was given powers to freeze Sahara’s accounts, attach properties etc. Sahara has repeatedly missed deadlines to comply with the Supreme Court’s orders. It claims the total money due is only Rs. 5,200 Cr, as the balance amount has already been repaid. SEBI meanwhile, told the court that while it had begun the refund process; it couldn’t trace many of Sahara’s investors as details submitted by Sahara were not in the prescribed format, with addresses and other details missing in some cases. 
 
5) What has the court done today? 
 
Since Sahara hasn't been able to deposit the Rs. 24,000 Cr amount with SEBI, the Supreme Court has asked Sahara India to submit a bank guarantee for Rs. 20,000 Cr before October 28th which is the date for the next hearing of the case. Sebi had earlier rejected Sahara’s offer to secure the difference (between Rs 5,200 and 24,000) through immovable property entrusted with a bank trustee. 
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 04 2013 | 5:42 PM IST

Next Story