Delhi court defers hanging of 4 Nirbhaya case convicts till further orders

The attack on December 16, 2012 prompted India to enact tough new laws against sexual violence

Nirbhaya case
(Photo: Shutterstock)
Press Trust of India New Delhi
5 min read Last Updated : Mar 06 2020 | 3:10 PM IST
A Delhi court Monday deferred till further order the hanging of four death row convicts in the 2012 Nirbhaya gang rape and murder case pending disposal of a convict's mercy plea, saying it was "an important constitutional legal principle".
All the convicts in the case were to be hanged together on Tuesday at 6 AM.
 
The execution of their death warrants has now been deferred thrice due to delays in exhausting legal remedies.
Additional Sessions Judge Dharmender Rana said the death sentence cannot be executed pending disposal of mercy petition of convict Pawan Gupta.
 
"Despite stiff resistance from the victim's side, I am of the opinion that any condemned convict must not meet his Creator with a grievance in his bosom that the courts of the country have not acted fairly in granting him an opportunity to exhaust his legal remedies," the judge said.
 
"As a cumulative effect of the discussion, I am of the opinion that the death sentence cannot be executed pending the disposal of the mercy petition of the convict. It is hereby directed that the execution of death warrants against all the convicts, scheduled for March 3 at 6 AM, is deferred till further orders," the judge added.
 
The court passed the order on Pawan's plea seeking to stay the execution as he filed a mercy petition before the President on Monday.

"I have no hesitation in holding that mercy petition is an important constitutional legal principle 'Ubi jus ubi remedium', i.e., where there is a right, there is a remedy, I am of the opinion that the application is very much maintainable," the judge said in a 6-page order.
 
While it was reserving the order on Pawan's fresh plea to stay the death warrant for Tuesday morning, the court had rapped the convict's lawyer for acting so late in filing the curative and mercy pleas.
 
"You (counsel) are playing with fire. You should be cautious," the judge told the counsel. Pawan's curative plea was rejected by the Supreme Court earlier in the day.
 
The trial court had earlier in the day dismissed Pawan's and co-accused Akshay Kumar Singh's applications for staying their death warrants. However, Pawan's lawyer, A P Singh, said he has filed a mercy plea and execution ought to be stayed. The court, thereafter, asked him to come post lunch to argue his case.

In the post-lunch hearing, the court pulled up Singh saying, "You are playing with fire, you should be cautious" and while considering that hearing was scheduled for tomorrow morning, added "one wrong move by anybody, and you know the consequences".
 
Tihar jail authorities, during the hearing, said the ball is in the government's court after the filing of the mercy petition, and the judge has no role for now.
 
"The plea is not maintainable... it is for the government to decide whether to carry on the sentence or not. At this juncture the courts cannot intervene as such intervention would be merely based upon presumptions and conjectures," the jail authorities said.
 
They said the President will seek a status report from the jail on Pawan's mercy plea and when that happens, it will suo motu stay the execution. The authorities, however, informed the court that they had received the information about filing of the mercy petition.


The court had on February 17 ordered that the four convicts -- Mukesh Kumar Singh (32), Pawan Gupta (25), Vinay Sharma (26) and Akshay Kumar Singh (31) -- be hanged on March 3 after it issued fresh death warrants, observing that deferring the execution any further would be "sacrilegious" to the rights of the victim for expeditious justice.
 
It had directed that the four men be hanged by neck on March 3 at 6 am until they are dead. This was for the third time that the death warrants were issued by the court against them.
 
The court had noted that death warrants were earlier issued on January 7 and the execution was later deferred twice -- on January 17 and January 31.
 
"Now deferring it any further would be sacrilegious to the rights of the victim for expeditious justice," it had said.
 
The first date of execution, January 22, was postponed to February 1 by a January 17 court order. Then, the trial court on January 31, stayed, "till further orders" the execution of the four convicts as they had not exhausted all their legal remedies.
 
The court was hearing the applications by Nirbhaya's parents and the Delhi government, seeking fresh death warrants for the convicts after the Supreme Court granted liberty to the authorities to approach the trial court for issuance of fresh date for the execution of these convicts.
 
The 23-year-old physiotherapy intern, who came to be known as 'Nirbhaya' (fearless), was gang-raped and savagely assaulted on the night of December 16, 2012, in a moving bus in south Delhi. She died of her injuries a fortnight later in a Singapore hospital.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Delhi Riots 2020Nirbhaya caseNirbhayaNirbhaya rape case

Next Story