Explained: Why did the victorious Chinese army withdraw in 1962?

The PLA faced the unappealing prospect of fighting US-equipped Indian forces without a route of withdrawal across the Himalayas

Chinese army 1962
Chinese troops had marched in and distributed themselves between villages, with individual units charged with administering specific juri­sdictions
Ajai Shukla
5 min read Last Updated : Nov 21 2022 | 10:26 PM IST
Sixty years ago, on November 21, 1962, with advancing Chinese columns virtually on the outskirts of Tezpur and the Indian Army in full retreat, Beijing unexpectedly decla­red a unilateral ceasefire and undertook to withdraw its forces 20 kilometres (km) behind the McMahon Line. This amounted to a declaration of victory, riding on the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) October attack on the handful of Indian soldiers of 7 Infantry Brigade, which was deployed on the Namka Chu River north of Tawang.

To this day, opinion is divided on what motivated Beijing to call off the game at the moment of victory. Indian Army units de­p­loyed at Dirang and Man­d­ala were racing for the exits, their attention focused on putt­ing the Brahmaputra River bet­ween the PLA and themselves. Barely one-tenth of India’s fighting forces had been committed to battle against the Chinese, but the fullness with which the PLA had put them to the sword made it seem as if the entire Indian military had been thoroughly vanq­uished. New Delhi’s discomfiture was complete after Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru appeared to have declared defeat in a radio broadcast on the eve of the ceasefire.

“We have had reverses at Walong, Se-La and today Bom­dila, a small town in NEFA, has also fallen. We shall not rest till the invader goes out of India or is pushed out. I want to make that clear to all of you, and especially our countrymen in Assam, to whom our heart goes out at this moment,” said Nehru in a choked voice.

Tezpur, the first major As­sam town, presented a scene of chaos. Flames flickered in the night as government officials frantically burnt documents. Outside the treasury, there was a bonfire of banknotes. The doors of the local lunatic asylum were thrown open to save “luna­tics” from falling into Chinese hands. Tezpur was where the Indian public had recei­v­ed the Dalai Lama in 1959, so it was felt that the PLA wo­uld exact reve­nge here. The ferry across the Brah­maputra, op­e­r­a­ted by a private company — the RSN and IGN Company — was packed to capacity with fleeing citizens. Prominent loc­als, such as tea garden managers (many of them European), flew out in Indian Airlines flights, cramming them to capacity. To­w­ards the end, the notables were leaving their vehicles at the airport with keys inside; they never thought they would come back and see their cars again.

Compared to this chaos, the area north of Bomdila was a picture of calm. Chinese troops had marched in and distributed themselves between villages, with individual units charged with administering specific juri­sdictions. Acting on clear ins­tructions to win the hearts and minds of the local Monpa people, Chinese soldiers helped lo­cals with fetching water, harves­ting crops and loo­k­ing after livestock. The PLA had clear ord­ers to win over the Monpas, which was evident from the sim­ilarity in PLA behaviour all across the border from Walong to Ta­wang. Unfortunately for the Chinese, the Monpas accep­ted their help but gave no loyalty in return. The reason, Monpas still say, was simple: The Chin­ese are untrustworthy! After subjugating Tibet in the 1950s the PLA had similarly tried to woo over the locals. But, very quickly, they revealed their true faces to the Tibetans. With no love forthcoming from the Mon­pas, the PLA saw no benefit in a long-term presence in Tawang.

A simultaneous PLA ploy was to highlight the Indian administration’s abandonment of Tawang in the face of the Chinese offensive. The Indian government, which fled ignominiously, was incapable of looking after them, the Chinese told the Monpas. However, given China’s treatment of the Tibetans in the 1950s, the Monpas clearly preferred the “cowardly” Indians.

Each of these reasons mutually reinforced an ever more co­m­pelling administrative case for the Chinese to vacate Tawa­ng, having “taught India a less­on”. Ultimately, however, it is likely to have been a tactical-operat­i­onal consideration that took the PLA back across the McMahon Line in December 1962. With winter setting in rapidly, the PLA’s extended supply line was becoming a vulnerab­i­l­ity. Soon, the snow-covered passes would have made it extremely difficult to maintain troops across the McMahon Line.

Meanwhile, in response to Jawaharlal Nehru’s plea to US Pre­sident John F Kenne­dy, Am­e­rican arms, ammunition and ext­reme cold clothing were flo­w­ing into India and being transported to Assam. The handful of Indian soldiers that had been defeated by the PLA was being rep­laced, reinforced and equip­ped with US weaponry.

At the extended points in Assam that the PLA reached on November 20, 1962, logistics would have made it easier for India to mobilise reserve formations, equipped with heavy artillery and tanks. The PLA faced the unappealing prospect of fighting US-equipped Indian forces without a route of withdrawal across the Himalayas. Deci­ding to quit while they were ahead, the PLA declared victory and withdrew to Tibet.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :ChinaChinese armyAssamPeople’s Liberation Army

Next Story