Ishrat Jahan case: CBI unable to prosecute ex-cops for lack of permissions

Upon being asked by the judge how long the government would take to respond, special public prosecutor R.C. Kodekar said the agency wouldn't know as it would be decided by "higher-level officers"

Ishrat Jahan
File Photo of Ishrat Jahan. Pakistani-American terrorist David Headley claimed on Thursday that Ishrat Jahan was an operative of terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba. Photo: PTI
The Wire New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 07 2019 | 10:45 AM IST
During a hearing at a special court on Saturday in the Ishrat Jahan encounter case, the CBI told special judge J.K. Pandya that the time limit to sanction the prosecution of accused retired police officers in the case is not its hands.

The police officers accused in the case include D.G. Vanzara and N.K. Amin.

As the Indian Express reported, the CBI also repeated its stand on how it has sought permission from the government to move against the retire officers only after the special court ordered it.

“Our stand has been very clear since the beginning (of the trial) that there is no need to seek permission (from the Gujarat government) for the prosecution (of former police officers). We moved (a plea) before the state (government) only after this court ordered us to do so,” special public prosecutor R.C. Kodekar, appearing for the CBI, told judge Pandya.

According to the Indian Express, Kodekar, upon being asked by the judge how long the government would take to respond, he said the agency wouldn’t know as it would be decided by “higher-level officers”.

Vanzara’s lawyers also argued against the CBI’s submission and spoke of how the five years had lapsed since the CBI had filed a chargesheet against seven Gujarat policemen in 2013 for the 2004 encounter in which19-year-old Mumbai college girl Ishrat Jahan, her friend Pranesh Pillai alias Javed Sheikh and two alleged Pakistani nationals – Zeeshan Johar and Amjiali Rana – were killed just outside Ahmedabad.

The policemen chargesheeted include Vanzara, former DGP P.P. Pandey. IPS officers G.L. Singhal, N.K. Amin and Tarun Barot.

The lawyers argued that the CBI should have taken the permission even before filing the chargesheet: “There has to be some time limit to complete the procedure now. It has been five years since the chargesheet was filed.”

The court was then adjourned.
Published in arrangement with The Wire

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story