The apex court asked the home ministry and the governor to file responses by Friday on petitions by Congress leaders, including a plea by chief whip of Congress Legislature Party in the Arunachal Pradesh Assembly Rajesh Tacho.
The five-member Bench, headed by judge J S Khehar, remarked “it is too serious a matter”. This was after Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi put forth a preliminary objection that the fresh plea by Tacho didn’t challenge the Presidential notification that promulgated Central rule in the state. It asked the Attorney General not to raise “technical objections”.
In a hurriedly called meeting on Sunday, the Union Cabinet had recommended President’s rule in the state that has seen a month-long political impasse. President Pranab Mukherjee had asked Home Minister Rajnath Singh to explain the reasons behind the decision in person. The President gave his assent to the Cabinet recommendation on Tuesday.
The Assembly is currently under suspended animation. The Congress feared and the Bharatiya Janata Party sources exuded confidence, that the petition might become redundant in the days to come if another government gets sworn in and manages to prove its majority.
This will also mean that the government at the Centre would not have to get the approval of the two Houses of Parliament when the Budget session convenes by February 23. The government is in a minority in the Rajya Sabha and it is nearly certain it will lose the motion in that House.
In the court, the Bench allowed the petitioners to amend their plea by Friday. Additional Solicitor General Satpal Jain, appearing for the governor, sought to maintain secrecy of the report that recommended President's rule. The Bench sought the report in a sealed cover.
“Unless we get the grounds for recommending the President's rule, we cannot proceed. If grounds are not the same in the proclamation, then it is totally a different ball game,” the Bench, also including judges Dipak Misra, M B Lokur, P C Ghose and N V Ramana, said during the hearing.
A battery of senior lawyers including Fali S Nariman, Kapil Sibal, Rajeev Dhawan and Vivek Tankha opposed the plea of the governor. But, Jain argued the report included photographs to suggest the governor was under threat as slaughtering of animals, burning of tyres and posters took place outside the Raj Bhawan.
On Rohatgi’s argument that there were more than one report on which the President acted, the Bench said: “You (Attorney General) have been saying there have been a series of recommendations. Look at the President's proclamation. It only speaks about one report and information,” it said.
Senior lawyer Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioners, said the court should look into the legality of the actions taken by the Centre even if there is a new chief minister, who will have to prove his majority before February 23. Sibal said if no government is formed, then there is no option but to dissolve the House and go for fresh elections.
The Bench is examining the Constitutional provisions on the scope of discretionary powers of the governor in recommending President’s rule after Nabam Tuki-led Congress government failed to meet the constitutional provision of even once convening an Assembly session in six months.
Congress’ 21 legislators had rebelled against Tuki and joined hands with 11 of BJP and two independents to 'impeach' the then Assembly speaker Nabam Rebia at a makeshift venue, a move branded as “illegal and unconstitutional” by the speaker. But, 27 MLAs in 60-member Assembly, including Tuki and his ministerial colleagues, boycotted the proceedings. The rebels later ‘elected’ another dissident Congressman Kalikho Pul as the new ‘chief minister’ of the state. The Centre has also appointed former Delhi Police Commissioner Y S Dadwal and retired IAS officer G S Patnaik as advisors to the governor.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)