Chandra, CBI prosecutor under lens for 'collusion'

Unitech denies wrongdoing, calls taped voice fabricated

BS Reporter New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 12 2013 | 12:58 AM IST
In a fresh twist to the telecom spectrum scam case, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has now turned the heat on one of its own, A K Singh, a prosecutor, along with Unitech Managing Director Sanjay Chandra, an accused in the case. CBI has initiated a preliminary inquiry against Singh for allegedly revealing the “prosecution strategy” to one of the 2G accused, suspected to be Chandra.

Both Singh and Chandra were called to the CBI headquarters for questioning in connection with the inquiry today. Following this, CBI removed Singh from the 2G case trial team and appointed another prosecutor in his place. It informed the court about the developments.

CBI had received an audio recording, with voices that were alleged to be of Singh and Chandra, from an anonymous person. Clarifying on the matter, the investigative agency said: “CBI maintains strict vigilance over its officers and prosecution teams, and no instance of professional misconduct is taken lightly.”

Unitech, on Chandra’s behalf, said in a statement: “Sanjay Chandra is currently unavailable owing to a bereavement in his family. However, he wishes to make it absolutely clear that he has never met the prosecutor in the 2G case outside of court or had any phone conversation with him. He denies the suggestion that his voice is on any alleged recording. It appears a fabricated voice recording has been sent anonymously to CBI. Any suggestion that Sanjay Chandra is linked with this recording is nothing but an attempt to malign him and prejudice his defence in the 2G case.”

For Chandra, who is out on bail, this could be the beginning of another ordeal. He was taken into judicial custody under Section 420 of IPC on April 20, 2011, for cheating and criminal conspiracy. He was granted bail following a Supreme Court order on November 23, 2011, after spending nearly eight months in Delhi’s Tihar jail.

CBI had alleged Chandra and Unitech Wireless were privy to special information since they had the demand draft of Rs 1,658 crore ready in October 2007, ahead of any official announcement of dates for deposit of 2G licence fee. Chandra always maintained his case should not be clubbed with the rest of the 17 accused in the 2G spectrum case, including former telecom minister,

A Raja, and three telcos — Swan Telecom, Unitech Wireless and Reliance Telecommunications.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 12 2013 | 12:58 AM IST

Next Story