UK mulled sending asylum-seekers to volcanic island in Atlantic ocean

The report said Patel later appeared to have dropped the plan

London:  Britain's Home Office Secretary Priti Patel leaves after a Cabinet meeting at 10 Downing Street in London, Thursday, July 25, 2019.  Newly installed Prime Minister Boris Johnson held his first Cabinet meeting Thursday, replacing many members
The Home Office did not deny that the idea of transferring asylum seekers to remote islands had been considered.
AP London
2 min read Last Updated : Sep 30 2020 | 11:05 PM IST

The British government reportedly proposed processing asylum-seekers on a remote volcanic island in the Atlantic Ocean more than 4,000 miles (6,435 kilometers) from the U.K. a plan that has been derided as inhumane and a logistical nightmare by critics.

The Financial Times reported Wednesday that British Home Secretary Priti Patel had ordered officials to explore plans for building an asylum processing center on Ascension Island, a British overseas territory with a population of under 1,000.

The report said Patel later appeared to have dropped the plan.

Thousands of people have crossed the English Channel this year by small boats to seek asylum in the U.K. Patel has pledged to stop the record number of arrivals and to make the route unviable," and has appointed a former Royal Marine to the new role of clandestine Channel threat commander."

The Home Office did not deny that the idea of transferring asylum seekers to remote islands had been considered.

As ministers have said, we are developing plans to reform policies and laws around illegal migration and asylum to ensure we are able to provide protection to those who need it, while preventing abuse of the system and the criminality associated with it, it said in a statement.

Alan Nicholls, a member of the Ascension Island Council, told the BBC on Wednesday the proposal was unfeasible.

Looking at cost and logistics, we are some 4,000-plus miles away from the UK, I would have thought it would be extremely expensive and a bit of a logistical nightmare to get asylum seekers here to Ascension, he said.

The opposition Labour party said the proposal by the ruling Conservative government was inhumane, completely impractical and wildly expensive.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :UKBritainvolcano

First Published: Sep 30 2020 | 10:59 PM IST

Next Story