The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a legal challenge filed by Mauritius-based Castleton Investment Ltd against the controversial minimum alternate tax (MAT) after the government said it would no longer impose it on foreign investors.
The dismissal comes after the government this month said it would revise its tax rules to exempt foreign companies from having to pay MAT. This had made it virtually certain the court would dismiss Castleton's legal challenge, which had questioned whether MAT could be imposed on foreign companies.
The imposition of MAT on foreign institutional investors since late last year had sparked an outcry against the government, given the tax had previously never been imposed on overseas companies.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)