Traditional IMs face pressure from the regulatory focus on price transparency and investors' growing appetite for passive investment strategies, which generate lower fees. There could be added pressure in the event of a downturn in investment performance, which would be detrimental for asset flows and fees. High valuations across multiple asset classes, monetary policy normalisation and political uncertainty could be catalysts for a downturn in investment performance despite the more favourable investment environment for active managers in 2017 compared with previous years.
The EU's Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, which from January 2018 will introduce additional reporting costs and require IMs to either pay for investment research or to separately disclose these costs if passing them on to clients, is among the regulatory pressures. We believe this increased transparency for EU firms may lead to similar transparency from IMs globally, adding to competitive pressure.
Some traditional IMs have sought to offset fee pressure through acquisitions to increase scale and diversification, a theme we expect to continue. Recent mergers and acquisitions have been integrated without major problems and appear to be delivering their expected cost savings.
Fitch expects that alternative IMs will remain cautious regarding investment decisions, given the higher average entry multiples and competitive underwriting conditions in the markets. Pockets of dislocation exist in certain industries, asset classes and geographies, but many alternative IMs believe that it may be some time before a true distressed cycle emerges, which would allow for a more meaningful increase in capital deployment. Alternative investment management firms rated by Fitch generally have global reach, large scale and the ability to arrange co-investment capital and debt financing, and are therefore better placed to deploy capital when opportunities arise.
Most alternative IMs have leverage above their long-term averages but we expect this to reduce in 2018 as fee-related EBITDA rises, driven by growing scale, fundraising and the start of investment periods for several large flagship funds that earn fees on committed capital.
Powered by Capital Market - Live News
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
