Custodial violence a serious issue: Court

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 17 2014 | 9:25 PM IST

A court has observed that custodial violence in any form is a serious issue and the judiciary must exhibit zero tolerance for such offences.

Additional Sessions Judge Kamini Lau made the observation while dealing a complaint regarding custodial violence in the Tihar jail premisse which left undertrial prisoner Sanjay alias Amit injured.

The complaint was filed by Amit's counsel and amicus curiae Rajneesh Antil, who has sought initiation of proceedings against the jail authorities, constable Parveen and Durga (both head wardens) and three under trial prisoners namely Vinod, Sunny and Veeru.

The court noted that during the production of Amit, he has a fracture in his left hand. On a query from the court, he said he was beaten in the prison premises by the jail staff.

The court termed it "highly surprising" that it has not got, till date, any information regarding any incident in which injuries were received by Amit, who is lodged in central jail, Tihar, from the jail administration.

"I may observe that custodial violence in any form is a serious issue and and the courts are required to exhibit zero tolerance for the same being violative of human rights as well as the statutory rights of a person in custody," the court said in an order delivered Wednesday but made available Thursday.

"It is surprising that the jail authorities have not been bothered to bring the incident to the notice of this court and it is only that when the accused has been produced before this court today (Wednesday) that this court had noticed his physical condition and made queries from him as regards the injuries on his body that the incident came to light," it said.

The court directed an inquiry in the incident in accordance with law and a complaint before the chief metropolitan magistrate, northwest Delhi, for initiating legal action. The court said the jail superintendent is directed to preserve all CCTV footage of the relevant date July 14-15, when the incident took place.

It sought the medical reports of the accused Sanjay alias Amit be placed before it, as well as seeking explanation from jail superintendent regarding why the report of the incident was not sent to the court.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 17 2014 | 9:20 PM IST

Next Story