Facing contempt proceedings, Prashant Bhushan defends remarks

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 05 2019 | 9:25 PM IST

Facing contempt of court for his "scandalous" tweets against the Centre over the appointment of M. Nageshwar Rao as interim Director of the CBI, advocate Prashant Bhushan on Tuesday defended his assertions.

The contempt of court petitions have been separately filed by Attorney General K.K. Venugopal and the Centre over Bhushan's claims in Twitter that Narendra Modi-led government "misled" the court.

One of the grounds to challenge the appointment was that it was made without the consent of the High-Powered Committee (HPC) comprising the Prime Minister, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge.

While Venugopal submitted before an apex court bench that Rao's appointment was discussed and approved by the HPC, Bhushan in Twitter contested the claim citing Kharge who participated in the panel meetings.

"I have just confirmed personally from the Leader of Opposition Mr Kharge that no discussion or decision in HPC meet was taken on re appt (reappointment) of Nageswara Rao as interim Director CBI. The government appears to have misled the court and perhaps submitted fabricated minutes of the HPC meeting!" Bhushan had tweeted on February 1.

Talking about the contempt petitions, Bhushan reiterated that he made the assertions after twice confirming from Kharge.

"I made the remarks after twice confirming it from Kharge who said that the reappointment of Rao was not discussed in the meeting. The Centre told the court that the issue was discussed in the meeting and gave the minutes of the meeting in sealed cover which was not shared with us.

"Kharge twice confirmed me that Rao's reappointment was not discussed in the meetings."

The petitions contend that Bhushan's posts tantamount to "interfering with and obstructing the administration of justice and attack on the Attorney General in such a brazen, wilful and malicious manner would tend to shake the very foundation of the justice delivery system."

The petitions are scheduled to be heard on Wednesday.

--IANS

and/arm/nir

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 05 2019 | 9:16 PM IST

Next Story