The idea that most people would prefer to die at home is not as strong as previously thought, finds a study, suggesting that for some, the comfort of home is not always the best or preferred place to leave this world.
According to Kristian Pollock from the University of Nottingham, focusing on place of death as the key indicator of quality in end of life care distracts attention from the experience of dying.
It calls for "more attention and resources to be spent on improving end of life care wherever this occurs, in hospitals or elsewhere," she added.
Dr Pollock argues that more research is needed regarding what matters most to people at the end of life.
"For example, the difference between people's preference regarding place of care, as opposed to place of death, is often overlooked," she noted.
In addition, a preference to die at home does not mean that place of death is the highest priority.
Evidence suggests that dying in pain is the greatest concern of patients and the public, and that pain is less well controlled at home.
Idealised accounts of "the good death" at home often do not recognise the reality of the pain and discomfort experienced by some dying patients.
"The person may have been alone, inadequately supported, in pain, distressed, and fearful," she pointed out.
Hospitals have become widely regarded as inappropriate and undesirable places to die, she explains.
There are concerns about poor quality of care and the high costs incurred by deaths in hospital.
However, hospitals may be preferred by patients who see them as places of safety and effective control of symptoms, especially for those who suffer distress and pain.
"Many patients wish to avoid imposing a burden on their families and may prefer to transfer responsibility for care from home to hospital," Dr Pollock emphasised.
It is important to recognise and accommodate the diversity of patient preferences for place of death.
"Disregarding the hospital as a site of terminal care, much greater thought and adequate resources must be directed to enabling hospitals to provide excellent support for dying patients and their families," she concluded in a paper which appeared in the British Medical Journal.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
