Ever wondered how quickly Chinese people move their eyes? It has nothing to do with the neurological behaviour or culture in people of Chinese origin.
According to researchers from University of Liverpool, in terms of eye movement patterns, Chinese ethnicity is more of a factor than culture.
"Many scientists believe that the eye movement patterns you develop are due to where you live - the books you read and the influence of your family, peers and community - your culture," said neurophysiologist Paul Knox from Liverpool University's institute of ageing and chronic disease.
"Our research has shown that this cannot be the case. What this leaves is the way we are made, perhaps our genetics," Knox added.
This may have a bearing on the way the brains in different groups react to injuries and disease.
To reach this conclusion, scientists tested three groups - students from China, British people with Chinese parents and white British people - to see how quickly their eyes reacted to dots appearing in the periphery of their vision.
These rapid eye movements, known as saccades, were timed in all of the participants to see which of them were capable of making high numbers of express saccades - particularly fast responses which begin a 10th of a second after a target appears.
The findings revealed that similar numbers of the British Chinese and Chinese participants made high numbers express saccades, with the white British participants making far fewer.
Culturally, the British Chinese participants were similar to their white British counterparts and different to the mainland Chinese students.
"This is contrary to several previous reports that looked at behaviour in Asian and white participants and concluded that culture explained behavioural differences between groups," Knox emphasised.
Twenty-seven percent of Chinese participants responded with high proportions of express saccades, similar to 22 percent of the British Chinese but many more than the 10 percent of white British participants.
Examining saccades from different populations is revealing a lot about underlying brain mechanisms and how we think, he noted in a study published in the journal PloS One.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
