The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central government why it was taking a long time in clearing the collegium recommendations for the appointment of judges to the higher judiciary.
A bench of Justice Madan B. Lokur and Justice Deepak Gupta also asked Attorney General (AG) K.K. Venugopal why appointments to the high court have not been made despite recommendations of the top court collegium.
The poser from the top court bench came in the course of the hearing of a plea pointing out that the Manipur High Court had just one judge which was adversely affecting its functioning.
The AG said it was the collegium which was not making recommendations while the Central government was being blamed.
Stressing that the collegium should look into the "far future" and make recommendations, Attorney General Venugopal said several high courts have multiple vacancies but the collegium recommends only one or two names.
Telling the court that the larger issue has to be looked into, he said the National Judicial Appointment Commission may have to be considered again.
Apparently unimpressed, the bench said that it was not concerned with all that.
"Tell us why is there a delay in processing recommendations by the collegium and making appointments," the court said, observing that the situation in the high courts in Northeast is critical -- Meghalaya and Tripura High Courts have only two judges while Manipur only one.
The top court recently took a dim view of lawyers in the Calcutta High Court going on strike protesting the failure to fill up vacancies and the appointment of a Chief Justice -- which has been done since then.
In the course of hearing of a plea on April 19, a bench of Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman said: "A strike is not an answer... strikes can't be linked to that. Vacancies have to be filled up."
However, the court did not agree with the AG's suggestion that the question of strike has to be examined along with that of the vacancies.
Telling the AG "if we combine the two, it would provide an alibi for strike", Justice Goel had said there are vacancies in the high courts as there were not enough suitable candidates and that unsuitable candidates can't be recommended for appointment.
--IANS
pk/him/bg
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
