Technology has the potential to drive demand for these services many fold. As James Bessen’s National Bureau of Economic Research working papers No. 24,235 from January 2018 points out: “In an earlier era, cotton textile consumption soared following the introduction of the power loom at US textile units in 1814; steel consumption grew following the US adoption of the Bessemer steelmaking process in 1856, and Henry Ford’s assembly line in 1913 initiated rapid growth in motor vehicles.”
And to make this happen, we may need to relook at India’s current approach to innovation. The path that innovation takes even in “capitalist” countries like the US is of state-drive initiatives. This is a “well-kept secret” and the US media portrays the individual entrepreneur as the pioneer and hero. Mariana Mazzucato’s book, The Entrepreneurial State, debunks the myth of a lumbering, bureaucratic state versus a dynamic, innovative private sector. In a series of case studies, in IT to biotechnology, she shows that the private sector finds the courage to invest only after the state, often the defence sector part of it, has made the high-risk investments. She devotes a whole chapter to demonstrating that every technology that makes the iPhone so “smart” was US defence department funded and private company executed: The Internet, global positioning system, its touch-screen display and the voice-activated Siri. This is one area where India spectacularly fails. Defence funding is channelled to state-owned research organisations where scientists are merely bureaucrats holding meetings and sending out minutes of meetings and press releases, but have long ago stopped any innovative work. Unless this tragedy is fixed, India’s chances to create world-conquering and job-creating new industries are slim.