No prizes for guessing what everyone and her aunt expect from Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s Budget: She should restore the sanctity of the annual estimation of revenue and expenses by presenting credible fiscal numbers.
In the last Budget, her first, she had not only stuck to the path of fiscal consolidation but also improved the fiscal deficit target — from 3.4 per cent of the GDP in the Interim Budget to 3.3 per cent. The figure was based on an assumption that the nominal GDP will grow at 11 per cent, higher than 10.5 per cent projected in the Interim Budget. The finance minister also expected higher dividend from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and more money from selling government stake in companies. The tax collection target, too, was ambitious — estimating a 18.3 per cent growth in fiscal year 2020, more than double of what was achieved in 2019.
It’s nice to see that the government junked its plan to raise part of its annual gross borrowing overseas in foreign currencies but the Rs 70,000 crore recapitalisation package of public sector banks has not achieved the purpose. They are not lending. Till January 3, credit growth in the current financial year has been a measly 2.8 per cent (against 8.3 per cent last year) and a rating agency has predicted a 58-year low credit growth for the current financial year.
The last Budget document spoke about “reforms... to ensure governance in public sector banks”. One would wonder what reforms have been undertaken since then. Of course, if consolidation is reform, then we have seen it. After a three-bank consolidation, led by Bank of Baroda, 10 public sector banks are being merged to form four banks. Why? I am sure it’s not a rescue plan for the sick banks; the government has a grand scheme behind it unlike its experiment with “privatisation” in the banking space. It is no longer the majority owner of IDBI Bank Ltd. It has passed the parcel to Life Insurance Corporation of India.
Since 1986, the government has pumped in close to Rs 4.17 trillion capital in public sector banks (PSBs) in different forms; the bulk of the amount — Rs 3.85 trillion — has flowed in the past decade since 2009. How much has the government earned from this in the form of dividend? Should it continue to do so?
In 2000, the then finance minister of the National Democratic Alliance-I government Yashwant Sinha had announced: “To meet the minimum capital adequacy norms set by RBI and to enable the banks to expand their operations, public sector banks will need more capital. With the government budget under severe strain, such capital has to be raised from the public which will result in reduction in government shareholding. To facilitate this process, government has decided to accept the recommendations of the Narasimham Committee on Banking Sector Reforms for reducing the requirement of minimum shareholding by the government in nationalised banks to 33 per cent. This will be done without changing the public sector character of banks and while ensuring that fresh issue of shares is widely held by the public.”