Three telling recent indicators and why slowing economy needs a boost

There is a need for an economic stimulus, especially when demand growth is slowing and there is spare capacity in the system, but the policy response has been anything but, writes T N Ninan

economy, business, India
Photo: Shutterstock
T N Ninan
Last Updated : Dec 08 2018 | 12:42 AM IST
The last couple of weeks have made three things clear. First, the economy is slowing down. Following the release of the lower-than-expected July-September growth number for gross domestic product (GDP), most analysts have lowered their full-year growth forecasts. Some project second-half growth at under 7 per cent. The encouraging sign is a pick-up in investment, depressed so far, but that is overshadowed by flagging consumer spending. The Reserve Bank recognises this, but continues to project full-year growth at 7.4 per cent. Even that implies a second-half growth rate of only 7.2 per cent — no better than the unsatisfactory trend rate from 2014.
 
Second, inflation has dipped more sharply than expected. RBI targets 4 per cent inflation. The current rate has been below that for three months, and just 3.3 per cent for the latest month (October). Agricultural price inflation is lower still. The quarterly GDP numbers record a sharp deterioration in terms of trade for agriculture. This explains why farmers are in such distress in many states, even as depressed rural wages have contributed to poor rural demand.
 
And third, the full year’s fiscal deficit target was crossed by October-end. The government insists that it will stay within the full-year target of 3.3 per cent of GDP (down from 3.5 per cent in the last two years), but there is the growing possibility that it will be able to do so only by withholding payments that are due on various counts. In other words, it will be a fudge.
 
The first two indicators (lower economic growth and below-target inflation) point to the need for an economic stimulus, especially when demand growth is slowing and there is spare capacity in the system. Yet the policy response has been anything but. The government continues to insist on sticking to fiscal contraction. RBI on its part argues that it needs more time to understand price trends, and therefore has not lowered its policy rate of 6.5 per cent. This, despite a more than 3 percentage point gap between that and the current inflation rate. Both the government and RBI should re-examine their positions.
 
Loan rates in the market are simply too high. HDFC’s home loan rates range from 8.8 per cent to 9.5 per cent, at a time when house prices are falling. Naturally, housing demand is low. Most banks have a lending rate of over 9 per cent for their best customers. Small and medium enterprises borrow at much higher rates of interest. The effective borrowing rate for perhaps the majority of companies is more than their return on capital employed. That translates to “unaffordable”. Interest rates need to drop if there is to be broad-based economic revival.
 
On its part, the fiscal stance should be less rigid. The great danger in overspending by the government is that it lets loose inflation, which becomes difficult to tame. That is not a serious danger today, when inflation is below target and the danger of runaway oil prices has passed. There is therefore a legitimate case for arguing that the government should allow the deficit level to inch up to a more realistic 3.5 per cent of GDP, the same level as in the last two years. That will be a neutral, not expansionary, stance, easily justified in the current situation, and realistic since the deficit has already crossed the full year’s 3.3 per cent target in seven months.
 
Finally, there has to be a policy package to shore up agricultural prices, especially for crops with greater price volatility. The target to double agricultural exports is a start, but more needs to be done — and quickly. It is only when farmers get a better price that agricultural wages go up, reducing rural poverty and boosting rural demand. Politically, the Vajpayee government suppressed food prices and paid the price. The first Manmohan Singh government corrected that, despite the cost of higher inflation, and won re-election. So far, the Modi government has been repeating the Vajpayee mistake. Course correction today would be good politics and also good economics.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper
Next Story