'Battery cars better than fuel cell vehicles to cut emissions'

Image
Press Trust of India Boston
Last Updated : Nov 15 2016 | 4:49 PM IST
Electric battery cars are a better choice for reducing carbon dioxide emissions than vehicles that run on hydrogen fuel cells in terms of overall costs, according to a new study.
Cars with hydrogen infrastructure provide few additional energy benefits besides clean transportation, according to researchers from Stanford University in the US and the Technical University of Munich (TUM) in Germany.
They compared cars that run on batteries versus hydrogen fuel cells in a hypothetical future where the cost of electric vehicles is more affordable.
"We looked at how large-scale adoption of electric vehicles would affect total energy use in a community, for buildings as well as transportation," said lead author Markus Felgenhauer, from TUM.
"We found that investing in all-electric battery vehicles is a more economical choice for reducing carbon dioxide emissions, primarily due to their lower cost and significantly higher energy efficiency," said Felgenhauer.
Electric vehicles come in two flavours: plug-in cars with rechargeable batteries, and fuel cell vehicles that convert hydrogen gas into clean electricity.
Unlike gasoline-powered cars, battery and fuel cell vehicles emit zero carbon when driven. But deploying them at scale will require a costly new infrastructure for charging batteries or delivering hydrogen fuel.
The researchers focused on California, a leader in electric vehicle transportation. Statewide, battery electric cars are growing in popularity.
"In terms of overall costs, we found that battery electric vehicles are better than fuel cell vehicles for reducing emissions," Felgenhauer said.
The analysis showed that to be cost competitive, fuel cell vehicles would have to be priced much lower than battery vehicles, the researchers said.
However, fuel cell vehicles are likely to be significantly more expensive than battery vehicles for the foreseeable future.
"Another supposed benefit of hydrogen - storing surplus solar energy - did not pan out in our analysis either. We found that in 2035, only a small amount of solar hydrogen storage would be used for heating and lighting buildings," Felgenhauer added.
The study appears in the journal Energy.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 15 2016 | 4:49 PM IST

Next Story