BJP, AAP welcome SC decision in poll-bound Delhi

'This provision can be provided in existing EVMs without additional cost or change in technology'

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 27 2013 | 9:07 PM IST
Delhi, where assembly election is due in November, could be one of the first states in the country where voters may have the option of rejecting all the candidates in their constituency if they do not like any of them.

In a landmark judgement, the Supreme Court today allowed casting of "negative votes" by citizens. The apex court also noted that this provision can be provided in existing electronic voting machines (EVMs) without any "additional cost" or change in the technology.

The judgement has been welcomed by Delhi's unit of Bharatiya Janta Party (BJP) and Aam Aadami Party (AAP) which said that it was the first step towards electoral reforms.

"We welcome the Supreme Court's decision. It is a historic judgement. This is the first step, next our step would be to bring Right to Reject which would ensure cancellation of election, if no candidate gets majority votes and "non above the above" (NOTA) get most of the votes," said AAP National Convener Arvind Kejriwal.

This would deter political parties from again fielding the rejected candidates, said Kejriwal.

A similar view was aired by senior BJP leader and Leader of Opposition in Delhi Legislative Assembly V K Malhotra. "We welcome the decision very much. It is a step towards electoral reforms," said Malhotra.

"The judgment will increase the polling per centage in the upcoming election. There are many people who do not turn up at polling booths to cast their votes. At least, now they could come and say that they do not like anyone," said Malhotra.

However, Delhi Pradesh Congress Committee (DPCC) President JP Aggarwal said he would for the central leadership's reponse.

"The party's line is yet to come. So far no statement has come from All India Congress Committee (AICC). This decision does not concern Delhi alone, but is a national issue," said Agarwal.

The Supreme Court today said that if a person is not allowed to cast negative votes, it would "defeat" the rights of the citizens as ensured by the Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam, which held that voters have a right to reject all candidates contesting polls in a constituency by pressing a button for negative vote, observed that essence of the electoral system should be to ensure a voter's freedom to exercise free choice.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 27 2013 | 9:01 PM IST

Next Story