The affidavit was recently filed by Salim Mulani, assistant engineer (Building and Factory department) of BMC, in reply to the petition filed by Sharma challenging the notice issued to him.
The civic body, in its affidavit, said that Sharma's flat on ninth floor of the building had unauthorisedly merged elevation features, ducts, common passage and parts of the parking podium into the flat.
It further said that Sharma was asked to remove the unauthorised construction, but he has not done so till date and has neither submitted any reply or documents to the corporation in his defense.
"Since Sharma carried out unauthorised work beyond the approved plan, he is not liable for any relief and his petition should be dismissed and cost should be imposed on him," the affidavit said.
Sharma's petition is likely to come up for hearing next week.
The court had on the last date of hearing directed all parties involved to maintain status quo in the matter, which means the civic body cannot initiate action of demolition of the alleged illegal structure.
Apart from Sharma and Khan, another resident and the developer of the building, Dev Land and Housing Private Ltd, have also petitioned the high court.
Sharma, in his petition, claimed that the BMC notice was "bad in law" and issued with "malafide intentions".
"In March and April 2010, the civic body issued
However, on November 14, 2014, BMC's assistant engineer from Building and Factory department issued notice to Sharma claiming that he had made some illegal constructions at his flat in the building, and sought his reply.
Sharma, in his reply to the BMC, said no unauthorised construction was carried out at his flat in the building.
The civic body had on December 1, 2014, responded by saying that the actor's clarification was unacceptable.
On December 28, 2014, the sessions court granted him interim relief and directed the civic body not to initiate any action pending hearing of the application.
"Despite the sessions court order, the corporation issued another notice on April 28 this year directing razing of the building," the comedian said in his petition.
Sharma and Khan sought the BMC notice to be set aside and direction to be issued to the corporation not to act upon the notice pending hearing of the petition.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
