Chandy gets relief from court in solar scam case

Image
Press Trust of India Bengaluru
Last Updated : Apr 05 2017 | 10:32 PM IST
In a relief to former Kerala Chief Minister Oommen Chandy, a city civil court today annulled its verdict directing six persons, including him and a firmto together pay Rs 1,60,85,700 in a case relating to the alleged solar scam.
The case will be heard afresh from June 1.
Judge N R Channakeshava gave the relief after the prosecution, during cross examination of Chandy, failed to establish that the defendant had made changes to the affidavit which it had received.
On January 2, the complainant in the case, case city- based businessman M K Kuruvilla, had sought time to study the affidavit, alleging it was different from the copy he had received.
Chandy had moved Additional City Civil and Sessions Court on October 24 last which had directed six persons, including him, and a firm together to pay Rs 1,60,85,700 toKuruvilla with 12 per cent interest for a solar power projectwhich did not materialise.
Chandy had filed two applications appealing against the earlier verdict.
The first had challenged the court'sex-parte order and the second sought that his arguments beheard.
On January 10, the court completed the cross-examination of Chandy after he had replied to several queries.
Kuruvilla had filed a civil petition in 2015 seeking return of Rs 1,60,85,700 deposited with SCOSSA Educational Consultants Private Limited for setting up a solar power project in Kerala.
According to Kuruvilla, in 2011, he got acquainted with one Binu Nair, who claimed to be Director of Kochi-based SCOSSA.
The petitioner had said that Nair had approached him for setting up the solar power project.
The petition stated that Nair had claimed that one of thedirectors of SCOSSA, Andrews, was Chandy's first cousin andwould be appointed consultant to the project and that he would operate from Abu Dhabi.
Kuruvilla had also submitted that Nair had named one Diljith as another director of SCOSSA who, he claimed, was the private secretary to Chandy and contended that the former Chief Minister too was jointly liable to return his money.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 05 2017 | 10:32 PM IST

Next Story