'China should force India, US to stop protectionist measures'

Image
Press Trust of India Beijing
Last Updated : Oct 06 2016 | 3:22 PM IST
China should put more pressure on India and the US to "force them" not to take trade protectionist measures against Chinese goods by imposing anti- dumping duties, state-run media here said.
"India has initiated 15 trade remedy investigations against Chinese products in the first eight months of the year, with observers forecasting even more probes in the foreseeable future," the Global Times reported.
Referring to reports that India's commerce ministry has recommended imposition of anti-dumping duties on imports of Chinese steel wire rods, the daily said in a recent article "it seems trade protectionism is rising in India as New Delhi looks to significantly expand its domestic steel sector, making China one of the biggest victims".
"The gradually increasing homogeneity of the two countries' economic structures has pushed up competition and economic friction, which has placed pressure on New Delhi to turn to protectionism in a bid to safeguard its nascent domestic industries," the article said.
"The US and India are the largest and second-largest source of trade remedy probes against Chinese goods, respectively. The Chinese authorities should put more pressure on Washington and New Delhi to force them to refrain from the rise of trade protectionist measures," it said.
China, the world's largest trader of goods, is an influential economic partner with both the US and India, it said.
"This position should give Beijing enough weight to carry out resolute countermeasures against any unfair treatment. China, one of those most impacted by trade protectionism, has no reason to keep itself out of the business," it said.
"As China faces rising trade remedy probes, work needs to be done to improve the country's quick-response ability. The authorities should strengthen communication between various government departments and shorten the decision-making process.
"Additionally, the government may need to consider providing subsidies to Chinese companies which suffer losses in trade remedy cases, in a bid to help increase their ability to make appropriate responses in the cases," it said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 06 2016 | 3:22 PM IST

Next Story