"You have no idea how personally frustrated and irritated I am about this lack of implementation of what was intended in the first place, especially when everybody else has decided to implement it (the quota reforms)," Lagarde said in response to question at a meeting at RBI headquarters here.
The IMF quota reforms seek to provide greater say to emerging economies like India at the Fund, where the US and large European countries command high influence. The ratification of the US is necessary for implementing the reforms, agreed by the member countries way back in 2010.
At present, India has a quota of 2.44 per cent, with 2.34 per cent voting right in the IMF, while the US has 17.69 per cent, with 16.75 per cent voting right, followed by Japan at 6.56 per cent and 6.23 per cent voting share.
Yesterday Lagarde told the LSR students in Delhi that the US was "not ratifying" due to its own reasons".
"It's hard work because there is one member which is not ratifying. The US that was determined to re-balance, to move Europeans out and bring emerging market economies in, is not ratifying the reform," she had told the students.
"We have enough resources...But it's not the right structure of financials. The quota based system gives it certainty and solidity designed by the initial founders and the entire membership. We have the financials but I wish it was structured in a different way," said Lagarde.
"We don't have it because it is conditional upon the other one happening which is the governance reforms, which provides for better representation of the under-represented countries including some of the emerging market economies like India," she added.
On the rising criticism that the fund is not credible as it lacks proper representation of all its members, she said: "I personally don't buy the argument that we are not credible, that we are not doing the best job... But this reform must be implemented and I hope will implement it. If it does not, we will explore alternative albeit infinitely less satisfactory ways to step in that direction."
Lagarde, who had also called on President Mukherjee, emphasised that IMF was a global multilateral institution where countries like India must have a bigger say.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
