Govt to evaluate Indian products that attract CVD in US

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 15 2014 | 10:23 PM IST
Encouraged by the WTO ruling against the US countervailing duty on certain Indian steel products, the government today said it is undertaking an evaluation of all other products on which America has applied the same provision to impose CVD.
"This ruling potentially questions the validity of a number of other CVD (countervailing duty) proceedings conducted by the United States on products of Indian origin.
"The government is undertaking an evaluation all other products of Indian origin on which the US has applied the same provision to arrive at CVD," the Commerce Ministry said.
This provision, it added, has been in existence in the US for many years and India is the first country to successfully challenge this provision.
The US Department of Commerce (USDOC) had imposed CVD on India's exports of hot rolled carbon steel flat products.
The measures continue to be in force and adversely impact the Indian exports, the Ministry added.
The World Trade Organisation Dispute Settlement Panel has held that the US law mandating cumulation of non-subsidised imports with subsidised imports while determining injury in a CVD investigation is inconsistent with WTO obligations.
The panel also held that the US had no factual basis to hold that the grant of mining rights for iron ore and coal was a subsidy.
It has also found that the US should not have ignored market prices available in India while determining the amount of subsidies, if any.
"The Panel has also held that the United States was not correct in applying adverse facts standard in 73 out of 85 instances for imposition of penultimate duty," the Ministry said.
The WTO body could not consider some of India's claims such as those relating to the methods of calculating the amount of subsidies and one relating to the application of adverse fact available.
The Panel has also not accepted India's claim that NMDC was not a "public body" within the meaning of WTO law, disregarding the previous ruling of the WTO Appellate Body in another WTO case.
"The ruling is appealable before the WTO Appellate Body and the decision to appeal against the same is currently under active consideration, in light of the systemic concerns on some of India's claims denied by the Panel" the Commerce Ministry added.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 15 2014 | 10:23 PM IST

Next Story