HC direction to Centre on transgenders bill

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Nov 18 2017 | 12:42 AM IST
Voicing concern over the plight of transgenders, the Madras High Court today directed the Centre to inform it whether a follow up action would be taken to make the transgender bill pending in the parliament a statute.
Giving the direction on a petition filed by two trangenders, Justice N Kirubakaran said a decision on the passage of the bill should be taken at the earliest because the transgenders were suffering.
He directed the central government that it has to inform the court whether the follow up action would be taken to make the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill 2016 a statute.
He noted that the Lok Sabha referred the bill to the parliamentary standing committee on social justice and empowerment on September 12, 2016, for examination and the committee submitted its report on July 21 this year.
"They (transgenders) are unable to even use public facilities like washroom for their convenience. If any right is given under the proposed act, it will definitely address this problem also," the judge said.
The judge also directed the Centre to inform the court why it introduced its own bill in the Lok Sabha when already a private member bill "The Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2014" was passed unanimously by the Rajya Sabha on April 24, 2015, and subsequently came to the lower House.
He was referring to a submission by the counsel for the Centre in this regard.
Taking a serious view of the Tamil Nadu government's failure in implementing the court's earlier direction on reservation to transgenders, the judge said a decision shall be taken on or before November 27 failing which the health secretary, and the secretary, Social Welfare Department have to appear in the court.
A bench of the high court had directed the state government to take a decision on the reservation for the transgenders within six months.
"The period of six months has already expired and even today it is stated that the decision is being considered," he noted in his order.
They could not postpone the issue of making reservation to transgenders indefinitely, the judge said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 18 2017 | 12:42 AM IST

Next Story