Justice G R Swaminathan was passing interim orders on a batch of petitions filed by 100 candidates who had applied for the posts, seeking to quash the February 9 TRB order, issued in the backdrop of allegations of tampering of the exam coding sheets to inflate the marks of select candidates.
The petitioners had submitted that the results and final key answers for non-engineering lecturers were released on November 7 last year.
During revaluation, discrepancies were noted only in 200 candidates, out of over 1,13,567 who took the examination in September, 2017.
It was unfair to cancel the entire recruitment process for the discrepancies related to 200 candidates, they had argued.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
