Jaya acquittal, 'fit case' for appeal in SC, says SPP

Image
Press Trust of India Bengaluru
Last Updated : May 14 2015 | 8:28 PM IST
Special Public Prosecutor B V Acharya has advised Karnataka government to file an appeal in the Supreme Court against acquittal of former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa and three others in the disproportionate assets case, saying it was a "fit case" to do so.
"As per rules, I have to submit my opinion. I have done it. I have said it is a fit case for appealing in SC," Acharya told PTI.
Asked if the ball is now in the government's court, he said, "yes."
Jayalalithaa was on May 11 acquitted by the Karnataka High Court in the disproportionate assets case that came as a huge relief to the AIADMK chief, clearing the decks for her political comeback and return to the Chief Minister's post.
After the verdict, Acharya had said that prosecution case had been "seriously prejudiced" in the case as the state of Karnataka and SPP appointed by it were denied an opportunity to convince High Court through oral arguments.
Acharya, who was re-appointed SPP by Karnataka Government after the Supreme Court held as bad in law the appointment of Bhavani Singh to the post by the Tamil Nadu Government, had submitted written submissions seeking rejection of Jayalalithaa's appeal.
He had also said that the high court verdict acquitting the former Chief Minister had "glaring arithmetical error" relating to her disproportionate assets.
Maintaining that his government has got nothing to do with DMK or AIADMK, Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah had yesterday said it would take a "legal decision" on filing an appeal in the Supreme Court.
Karnataka is the sole prosecuting agency in the 19-year-old disproportionate assets case.
The Karnataka High Court's judgement came on appeals by Jayalalithaa and her close aide Sasikala Natarajan and two of latter's relatives against the judgement of the Special Court Judge John Michael D'Cunha.
The Special Court had on September 27 last year held Jayalalithaa and three others guilty of corruption and awarded four years jail term, due to which she attracted disqualification as an MLA.
The judge had also slapped a fine of Rs 100 crore on her and Rs 10 crore each on three other convicts.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 14 2015 | 8:28 PM IST

Next Story