Notably, Goa Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar had last week said his state could share the river water with Karnataka for drinking purposes and expressed his willingness for bilateral talks.
Senior counsel Atmaram Nadkarni, representing Goa, in his 531-page submission before the Mahadayi Water Dispute Tribunal yesterday, pleaded against allowing the diversion of the Mahadayi river water by the governments of Karnataka and Maharashtra.
"The requirement of Karnataka in the Malaprabha reservoir as also the drinking water requirement in the twin cities of Hubli and Dharwad is a bogey of completely incorrect statements...," Nadkarni alleged in his submission.
The tribunal is expected to hear the final arguments in the matter in the first week of next month.
The coastal state also submitted before the tribunal that the case of drinking water, pleaded and sought to be proved by Karnataka, is completely at variance with each other, self- contradictory and exposes complete falsehood.
Supporting its contention, Goa said that Karnataka is claiming 7.56 TMC of water for drinking to be supplied to Hubli-Dharward areas.
"Therefore, the claim is that the population would grow three times more in the period from 2014 to 2051," reads the submission of Nadkarni before the tribunal.
Goa has said that in a period of 40 years, the population never triples as the increase is normally on an average 10 per cent per decade.
"This can also be contrasted with the figures in Hubli- Dharward areas for the last three decades. The population in 1981 was 5,27,108 and in 2011 it was 9,43,857. This means there was an increase of hardly around three lakh which comes to around 26 per cent per decade," the state said.
Nadkarni said Goa's case was essentially to challenge the construction of 12 dams by Karnataka on the Mahadayi river and also oppose Karnataka's proposal to divert its water to the Malaprabha reservoir.
He said Goa opposed these moves as it would result in a complete aquatic, marine and terrestrial ecology disaster and also deprive the state of water for drinking, irrigation and industrial needs.
The counsel also said that Karnataka and Maharashtra do not have any right, authority or power to divert water of the Mahadayi outside the river basin, without the concurrence of Goa.
The Mahadayi (called Mandovi in Goa) originates in Karnataka and flows to Goa and Maharashtra.
The water sharing issue is politically sensitive one, especially in five north Karnataka districts.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
