Kin get Rs 44.74 lakh for man's death in road accident

Image
Press Trust of India Thane
Last Updated : Aug 03 2016 | 4:02 PM IST
An automobile dealer and his insurer have been asked by Thane Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to pay Rs 44.74 lakh to a woman and her two children for the death of her husband in a road accident in 2013.
MACT Chairman and Principal District Judge S M Gavhane directed M/s Asset Auto Pvt Ltd, Dimapur, Nagaland (as the offending car was registered in Nagaland), owned by Parvinder Singh, and Bharti AXA General Insurance Company to jointly and severally make the payment to the claimants with 9 per cent interest from May 2013.
On March 2, 2013, Gorakh Jadhav (aged aroud 55) was walking on a road at Nerul in Navi Mumbai when the opponent's BMW hit him. Jadhav sustained serious injuries and died on way to hospital.
An offence of rash and negligent driving was registered against the vehicle driver with Nerul police, said the claimants -- Jadhav's widow Sharda Gorakh Jadhav (49), and children Anil Gorakh Jadhav (25) and Arpana Gorakh Jadhav (23) -- in their application before the MACT.
The claimants' advocate, G A Vinod, informed the MACT that Jadhav was working with the BEST as an office assistant and drawing monthly salary of around Rs 50,000.
They sought a compensation of Rs 53.55 lakh along with 18 per cent interest from the two respondents.
However, the respondents contended that the deceased's two children were major and cannot be said to be dependent on him. The deceased himself was negligent in crossing the road and dashed against the offending car. Therefore, the applicants are not entitled to compensation, they said.
The interest rate of 18 per cent as claimed was highly excessive and would not be more than 6 per cent, they said.
The judge noted that though it is a case of both the opponents that the accident took place due to negligence of the deceased and there was no negligence of driver of the offending car, they have adduced no evidence to substantiate this contention. They have also not examined the offending car's drive, as he was the best witness to state that there was no negligence on his part.
Therefore, an adverse inference can be drawn against both the opponents that the accident took place due to rash and negligent driving of the car driver, and that there was no negligence of the deceased, the judge observed recently.
Hence, he awarded a compensation of Rs 44,74,928, which includes loss of dependency, consortium and funeral expenses, to the claimants.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 03 2016 | 4:02 PM IST

Next Story