Media should be sensitive in reporting matters under probe: HC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 01 2017 | 8:15 PM IST
The media cannot convict anyone or insinuate that someone is guilty during pendency of trial, the Delhi High Court said today and asked a TV channel to be "tempered and balanced" in airing news on the Sunanda Pushkar death case.
"The culture of thrusting a microphone in the face of a person needs to be deprecated," though the media's right to cover news cannot be curbed, the high court said.
In a 61-page judgement, Justice Manmohan observed that an individual affected by a news story "must be given an option to give his version, but he cannot be compelled to speak if he does not want to".
The court said every individual or an accused "has a right to silence" which needs to be respected.
Though the media has the right to cover stories which cannot be curbed, the court said it has to be sensitive while reporting matters under investigation and exercise "care and caution".
The court made the observations while dealing with three applications of Congress MP Shashi Tharoor seeking to restrain journalist Arnab Goswami and Republic TV from airing news with regard to his wife Sunanda Pushkar's death case.
It declined to restrain the journalist and the TV channel on the issue, but said they should seek Tharoor's version before airing news on his wife's death.
It held that in this case, the TV channel and the news anchor "have the right to air their stories and the same cannot be curbed, but it has to be tempered and balanced".
"This court is of the view that it is important that when criminal investigation has commenced, media reporting should be sensitive to the indeterminacy of the questions raised in the proceedings.
"Press cannot convict anyone or insinuate that he/she is guilty or make any other unsubstantiated claims. Press has to exercise care and caution while reporting about matters under investigation or pending trial," it observed.
It also said in the judgement that "no blanket winning right can be declared because the rights are neither absolute, nor in any hierarchal order, since they are of equal value.
"There is need to balance which has to be done on case to case basis," it added.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 01 2017 | 8:15 PM IST

Next Story