Need more public prosecutors to handle POCSO cases: HC told

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 08 2015 | 6:48 PM IST
The Delhi High Court was today informed that there are 200-600 cases of sexual offences against children pending in each of the designated courts in six district courts here set up under the POCSO Act and more public prosecutors are needed to handle them.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath was also told that the Delhi government did not apply its mind when it had informed the court that the lone public prosecutor in each designated POCSO court can handle the burden of cases.
The submissions were made by an advocate, who has filed a PIL on lack of number of independent public prosecutors in courts handling cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, in his rejoinder to the Delhi government's affidavit of December 24, 2014.
The city government in its affidavit had said there were 3,216 cases relating to sexual offences against children under POCSO Act pending before different sessions courts in capital and the public prosecutors appearing there can handle them "as it is not much in number to create pressure or burden".
Refuting the government's contention, advocate Gaurav Kumar Bansal has said in his rejoinder that "as per the list of pending cases provided by Additional Secretary (Home), Delhi government, the court of ASJ-1 of every district of national capital are overburdened and the number of cases in every court of Additional Sessions Judge(ASJ)-1 varies from 200 to 600 cases".
"The statement made by the Delhi government that the public prosecutor appearing in the court can handle cases under POCSO Act and it is not much in number as to create pressure / burden is uncalled for and reflects the non application mind," he has said.
He has contended that he found out under the Right to Information (RTI) Act that each special court not only handles cases under POCSO, but also deals with cases under Drugs and Cosmetics Act, MCOCA, SEBI Act apart from general trial cases.
He has said that looking at the number of cases under the POCSO Act as well as other Acts in each of the special courts, completion of trial within stipulated time was not possible if more independent special public prosecutors are not appointed.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 08 2015 | 6:48 PM IST

Next Story