Nitish disapproves of Modi govt's stance on triple talaq

Image
Press Trust of India Patna
Last Updated : Jan 07 2019 | 6:20 PM IST

Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar on Monday disapproved of the stance adopted by the Narendra Modi government on triple talaq, saying interaction, and not interference, was the way forward on the contentious issue.

Kumar said the practice of instant divorce had come under scanner after a Muslim woman came out in protest, but pointed out many other women from the community had signed memorandums against the ordinance brought a few months ago making instant triple talaq a penal offence as people take offence when they feel something is being imposed on them.

The related bill is pending in Parliament.

"This has always been the stand of our party and this is my suggestion with regard to how we should approach the sensitive matter," the chief minister, who is also the national president of JD(U) and is running his government in alliance with the BJP, told reporters.

Kumar was replying to queries on the sidelines of Lok Samvad, a public interaction programme, which used to be held on the first three Mondays of every month but had remained suspended for close to five months.

"Triple talaq has been a tradition in a particular community. Of course, women have been adversely affected and hence a need was felt to do something about it. But if there is a defect in the system those part of it should be helped and encouraged to get rid of the same," Kumar said.

People take offence when they feel something is being imposed on them and not enforced with their consent. Many women have also signed memorandums against the ordinance/bill on triple talaq, he said.

The JD(U) had vehemently opposed the ordinance on triple talaq brought by the Modi government after the Supreme Court declared the practice of instant triple talaq as ultra vires of the Constitution.

When a bill, introducing a provision for making adherence to the practice punishable with imprisonment, was brought in Lok Sabha recently, the JD(U) refused to vote in favour. Although the bill got passed by voice vote, the JD(U)'s divergent stance may cause a major hurdle in Rajya Sabha, where the NDA lacks majority.

Asked about the Ram temple issue, Kumar said, "Our party's stand has always been clear. It should be decided by the court of law. However, if some solution is arrived at by negotiations between the affected communities we would welcome that as well."

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 07 2019 | 6:20 PM IST

Next Story