PCB chief indicates nature of legal action yet to be decided

Image
Press Trust of India Karachi
Last Updated : Jan 02 2017 | 10:02 PM IST
Pakistan Cricket Board Chairman Shaharyar Khan today indicated that the PCB is yet to decide on the nature of legal recourse it would take against the BCCI for not honouring a MoU to play bilateral series.
Khan that it would take about a month for the PCB to decide what kind of legal recourse it would adopt against the BCCI for not honouring the MoU signed between them in 2014. He said the Board will take a decision after taking advice from its legal team.
"We might appoint a international barrister, a QC to advise us on our next step. But we have options of filing a case with either the Dispute Resolutions Committee of the International Cricket Council (ICC), the International Court of Arbitration for Sports or in an international court of law," Khan told PTI here today.
Khan said that the ongoing changes in the BCCI due to the Indian Supreme Court case will not deter the PCB from pursuing its legal course of action against the Indian Board.
"What is happening in the BCCI is there internal matter. But the PCB has decided that it must be compensated by either cricket matches or money for the losses it has suffered due to the BCCI not honouring the MoU signed between the two Boards in 2014," he said.
He said the PCB had faced losses of revenues in excess of USD 100 million due to the BCCI not honouring the MoU.
"We have consulted top legal experts and they have told us the MoU signifies an intent and a contract," he added.
The PCB chief said that Pakistan had been deprived of the chance to play two series due to the BCCI's refusal for bilateral cricket.
"Under the MoU, the two Boards are to play six series four of which we will host between 2015 and 2023. Even before the MoU they owed us a home series for the Test tour we made to India in 2007," he said.
Khan said given his diplomatic experience and knowhow of how Indo-Pak relations work, he was not very hopeful of any cricket taking place between the two countries this year.
"That is why we have now decided to pursue this matter legally. Because we have suffered financially and we need funds.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 02 2017 | 10:02 PM IST

Next Story