In an affidavit before the apex court, the state government submitted that Sharma was himself facing various criminal cases and also involved in "illicit relationships" with several married women who are his subordinate officers and relatives.
The affidavit, filed by an under secretary, referred to the proceedings before State Women Commission in which the lady was present along with her father and husband. The Chief Secretary was also present there.
"The lady is seriously perturbed, distressed and disturbed because of the false, scandalous, defamatory and maligning campaign using her name to achieve some hidden sinister agenda ostensibly to protect her 'right to privacy' an individual right, which she sincerely considers not to have been breached," the affidavit said.
The conversations, purportedly between August and September 2009, do not specifically mention Modi by name but refers to a 'saheb', which the portals claimed was the Gujarat Chief Minister at whose instance the snooping was done, a charge denied by Shah.
The state government filed its response on a petition filed by Sharma seeking CBI probe in snoopgate controversy.
